Navigate to « Harvest Should Be Well Underway, But We Remain Behind The Calendar Throughout The Cornbelt. | Main | Cornbelt Update »
September 24, 2009
Corn, Soybeans, Store, Sell, Or What?
What are the markets going to do? If you ask that question, expect to hear, “They will either go up or down or stay the same.” Since that is not the answer you want to hear, instead ask the question, “What are the markets indicating, and how should that be used along with market outlook information?” That question is more appropriate and will probably get you a valid answer that is more useful. So let’s ask that question and see what the answer is.
Many marketing decisions at harvest are rooted in the need for storage, and whether the potential price later in 2010 will pay storage costs. Marketing Specialist Melvin Brees at the University of Missouri writes in his latest Decisive Marketing newsletter that USDA’s September Crop Report forecast large corn and soybean supplies, which were bigger than the August forecast and may even be larger next month. But he says the late maturing crop could be in jeopardy with frost or freeze damage. Despite the large size of the crops, Brees says there will be a large demand for the crop, and corn carryout a year from now may even be less than it was this year. Additionally, the 110 million bushel soybean carryout from the old crop may only expand to 220 million bushels with the new crop because of consumption.
Brees suggests that good marketers take a long look at whether the demand estimates will hold, because livestock producers will be unable to hold steady or expand as USDA suggests if the ethanol industry is expanding at the same time. Additionally, he wonders if there will really be an increase in corn exports while global wheat supplies are large and wheat feeding could increase. Also, he wonders if US soybean exports will be as strong as USDA suggests with the expected expansion of South American soybean production.
Price ranges projected by USDA are $3.05 to $3.65 for corn and $8.10 to $10.10 for soybeans, and Brees says supply, use, and price projections suggest they would follow a normal pattern of a lower trend into harvest following by a post harvest price recovery. Since the September USDA Crop Report December corn has had a 38 cent trading range and November beans have traded in a nearly 90 cent range fostered by threats of frost to immature crops. Such uncertainty, says Brees, creates difficulty in making store or sell marketing decisions. Consequently, he says look for clues to guide your decision.
Corn. There is a storage premium being offered by the corn market based on March futures being 13 cents higher than December futures, and May futures providing an additional 9 cents. Also cash bids suggest that seasonal basis gains could add another 10 to 20 cents per bushel if stored. Brees says the market is telling farmers to store corn, but do not store it unpriced. He says, “When the futures market offers carry it is also a weaker demand signal. Corn supplies appear to be more than adequate to meet demand. Buyers are content to not acquire corn for future needs by bidding up nearby contracts to acquire inventories. They are willing to let someone else own and store the corn. Slower than expected demand or higher production could result in increasing carryover and disappointing prices, which would limit or eliminate storage returns.”
Soybeans. There is not a storage premium being offered by the soybean market. Brees says there is only a 3 cent advantage to selling January beans instead of November beans and it will cost more than that to store them. Additionally, March soybean futures were even lower than January prices, which is certainly a sell signal, not a store signal. Currently, the harvest basis for soybeans is stronger than normal, which means it will likely not improve to provide any basis gains. Subsequently, the strong basis and lack of carry discourage storage and encourage sales. Apparently, the market sees strong supplies coming from South America next spring and does not want to bid up those prices in the wake of strong competition.
Strategy. The market is saying store corn and sell beans. Compare your cash prices with the USDA estimated price range of $3.05 to $3.65 for corn and $8.10 to $10.10 for beans. Also compare the current prices and the price range with your cost of production, and since current prices may not offer a profit, the prospects for higher prices for corn may move you out of the red and into the black. Those gains may also help with the decision to market soybeans at lower prices than you would prefer, but they may already be offering a profit.
Risks. There is a risk that weather and diseased crops could diminish the supply of corn and soybeans, which would push prices higher, and offer opportunities to lock in higher prices. Also the outside markets such as energy, currency, and the general economy could move prices up or down from current levels. Storing corn unpriced is a speculative action that could result in the loss of the premiums being offered by the futures and cash markets. Storing soybeans unpriced is also a speculative action that may diminish current profits, or could increase them if South American crops fail. Brees says speculating on higher prices can also be accomplished with futures or options positions, rather than risking your cash commodity in the bin.
Summary:
Marketing decisions are never easy, but looking at what the markets are indicating can help make the necessary decisions. The corn market currently is offering a gain from both the futures and the basis by storing. The soybean market is not offering any significant gain from futures or basis, and suggesting beans should be sold. Marketers should compare prices they are offered with USDA’s estimated price ranges to see if there are profit opportunities. Grain that is stored unpriced has a risk of losing that premium, but if the marketer is confident of higher markets, then that advantage can be captured with a futures or options position.
Posted by Stu Ellis at September 24, 2009 12:11 AM | Permalink
Comments
Da Man is Corn Demand
Historically there may not be much more room to increase corn demand (use). Should the WASDE estimated use remain at 13.025 billion bushels to the October report, that will be the largest increase in estimated use; from a May report to an October report, going back to 1976. Corn use is up 980 million bushels from 2008-09. The 565 million bushel increase in demand from June’s report to September’s report is in the 91st percentile; should demand hold at current levels, when comparing corn use from June projections to June estimates one year later. For those years that saw demand increase from June to October, the average increase from that October report to next June estimate was an increase of 51 million bushels. (Maximum was in 790 million bushels in 1994-95. Minimum was -640 million bushels in 2008-09. The mid-point was 86 million bushels. Fifty six (56%) percent of time demand increased and 44% of the time it decreased.) History says there is a chance of an additional 560 million bushels of demand over current projections but 83 % of the time demand increases have been less than the amount already projected.
The demand change for soybeans from June to October (assuming the September Number holds) is 38 million bushels. That is in the top third of demand changes for the period. When comparing with those years that saw an increase in demand (from June to October) than this year’s increase is in the bottom 29%; room for increase. The average increase from June projections to June estimates, one year later, is 89 million bushels, for those years that saw an increase in demand from June to October. (The Maximum increase was 365 million bushel in 1994-95. The lowest was a decline of -187 million bushels 2005-06. The mid-point is 115 million bushels. Eleven (11%) percent of the time demand drops and 89% of the time it increases.) The average increase of 89 million bushel is 51 million bushels over the current projected increase in demand of 38 million bushels. A 51 million bushel increase in demand, with current tight ending stock would be noticed by the market. The challenge is production (yield) increases could more than offset the demand increase, resulting in lower prices not higher.
The issue above does a great job of framing the situation. We hope this historical prospective provides some useful insight.
Jib aka Gibberish
Posted by: Jib at September 24, 2009 11:22 PM
Is Light Corn a Harbinger of Increased Use?
According to South Dakota State University Extension Swine Specialist Bob Thaler, in a September 10, 2004 news release, all classes of swine can be fed light weight grain if mycotoxin-free. It seems hog performance (daily gain) is not affected by feeding light corn but efficiency is reduced, requiring more pound of grain per pound of gain. Cattle growing and finishing appear to be unaffected by the inclusion of light corn in their rations, as noted by Steve Paisley, Extension Beef Cattle Specialist, University of Wyoming in a piece titled, “Feeding Value of Light Test Weight Corn”.
The ethanol industry if forced to use light weight corn will require more pounds of grain per gallon. (The starch level in the kernel appears to be proportional to the test weight.) Should light weight corn be run through the ethanol plants more DDGS will be produced as the pounds of DDGS per gallon of ethanol produced will increase. (Sorry Mr. Ellis but it is hard to get away from that theme.) This may result in cheaper DDGS especially if DDGS are competing with light corn for the cattle feeding market. This factor along with increase ethanol production may put pressure are ethanol margins with extra byproduct becomes available.
(Harbinger is a term used by R.L. Nielsen of Purdue Agronomy Department in a piece titled, “Stress During Grain Fill: A Harbinger of Stalk Health Problems”. This article was updated September, 2009 and can be found at http://www.agry.purdue.edu/ext/corn/news/timeless/StalkHealth.html. It is worth a look.)
Posted by: Just Saying or Asking at October 7, 2009 9:42 AM
Post a comment